Recently, we have a nominee for the US Supreme Court. A JUDGE. Not a custodian, a file clerk, an attorney, but a JUDGE.
What does Judge mean in the dictionary? Let’s look at Websters 1828 dictionary (when people were sane) instead of today’s modern corrupted dictionaries:
One who has skill to decide on the merits of a question, or on the value of any thing; one who can discern truth and propriety.
To compare facts or ideas, and perceive their agreement or disagreement, and thus to distinguish truth from falsehood.
To form an opinion; to bring to issue the reasoning or deliberations of the mind.
To discern; to distinguish; to consider accurately for the purpose of forming an opinion or conclusion.
Like the movie The Sting, 1977, we see a con unfolding during a spectacle performance deemed a public hearing.
Read carefully. I’ll guide you through the hustle.
Overtly, we are presented with the setup:
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first black woman nominated to the Supreme Court, refused to define the word woman on the grounds that, as she put it, “I’m not a biologist.”
Jackson commented on an exchange with Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) in which the lawmaker asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals judge point-blank: “Can you provide a definition for the word woman?”
After a short back-and-forth, Jackson ultimately said: “No, I can’t.”
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked.
“Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.
Next, we get reactions that I won’t belabor, but everybody from politicians to news celebrities ridiculed Jackson and Blackburn. Take your pick.
So what’s NOT being stated:
Jackson, a mother having experienced childbirth, is compelled NOT to answer. Who has nominee Jackson under their thumb? There is no “LGBT” government department, militia, country, or syndicate. It’s a label given to a trend by mainstream media, Hollywood, Big Education, and Big Business. Ultimately, it’s an EXCUSE to permit what was previously considered irrational and disruptive behavior in the workplace and society. NOTE: The ADA act exists for requesting reasonable accommodation for actual disabilities. There is no government act for favoritism.
What NOBODY will ask Jackson; not republicans nor democrats:
WHO is pulling your strings? Who compelled you not to answer a reasonable, rational question? You are seeking the position of a Judge, a US Supreme Court judge no less. Why did Blackburn not drill deeper? Who will PENALIZE Jackson if she answers?
Why isn’t the press et al. asking these specific questions? It’s about time someone called a spade a spade and asked about the ELEPHANTS in the room pulling the strings of ALL these people, from the US Government to media celebrities.
This is a Sting operation, where the public is conned by authority figures ridiculing what used to be expected and legit into obscurity. Then, a new upside-down dogma replaces it without the populace catching the grift. It’s a Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) operation where they have flip-flopped Arthur Schopenhauer’s famous progression of truth by implanting a lie as the new truth.
Identity Politics has destroyed the fabric of our family, our children’s psyche, and our cornerstones of society: Schooling, The Workplace. We are in a new normal of lying, pretending to be the impossible, and grandstanding the replacement of biology. Where men are sanctioned to compete in women’s sports, and we’re all supposed to accept the con game of organizations that know better--but have SOLD OUT.
Let’s cut to the chase and consider the identity of geometry. For example, a math teacher asks you to identify the square vs. the circle for an exam question. If you fail to answer a square has four equal sides and four right angles, and that a circle is a round plane whose boundary consists of points equidistant from a fixed center point; you fail the course and won’t get a degree.
Students of geometry often become architects of buildings and the components that construct them. Are we to accept bridges and buildings that can’t function to please the feelings of delusional attention seekers?
Is that what’s next? Have we not yet seen enough destruction of our Western Civilization before our leaders are exposed as the frauds they are for selling out to interests that want to destroy the West?
As for identifying a woman vs. a man, it’s simple geometry. Any honest scientist of human anatomy, or a layperson for that matter, can, without any doubt, MEASURE the differences.
Like the male swimmer stealing women’s swimming medals, the truth is hanging right in front of you.
If you like my thoughts, please check out my novel, Descendants of Atlantis on Amazon. It's jam-packed with more!
Comments