What's the FIRST thing people will declare regarding this article? "Nah, I don't BELIEVE you!" And that makes my point--your BELIEFS are RULING YOU.
What IF--You're not driving the BUS, you're just a passenger? In NLP, we ask, "Who is driving the bus?" You can't have it both ways: People claim, "I do what I want." (Yet we observe they are always CONFORMING...OBEYING THE RULES).
These people are in DREAMLAND (Sleep-Walking), as evident by their behavior...behavior doesn't lie, but words do.
Back to Who is driving the BUS: are you awake and aware or not, an Individual or a Puppet? These "passengers" declare, "Well, you have to go along to get along. I have a job. I have to do what I'm told. So I bite my tongue and keep my opinions to myself."
**But when I question these people further, "Are you aware of what is going on around you, OUTSIDE of the "official orders, narratives, explanations"? THIS is when I discern to what degree the MATRIX of their beliefs, their SIMULACRA, has boxed them in.
A person (mind) locked in the Matrix-Simulacra won't respond with an open mind. Instead, they will ridicule me or my source; they fidget, get nervous or agitated, and even become threatening or violent.
This behavior is well known to NLP therapists when their client is being questioned as to their issue. EXACT IDENTICAL BEHAVIOR. Why? (The answer has already been stated above).
To recap, people unable to open their jail cell of beliefs will respond as if I'm INSANE to question anything outside their "reality."
Suppose you push such a person? They believe they are debating with you, but their rebuttals are only REPEATING the official narratives (not critical thinking). Or they tell you, "I know people who have died, gotten real SICK, so you see--this is REAL." Sorry, but that is known in mathematics as "Curve Fitting" (your "facts" are shoved into your desired belief-outcome, thus making them "fit").
One's Matrix-Simulacra prison becomes apparent when they refuse to discuss, forget even analyze, their BELIEFS. Examples of such beliefs: "Doctor Frankenstein and Dr. WHO said that we will all die UNLESS we DO X, Y, Z." "Everybody is dying from the NEW THING." "We will go back to normal after we do whatever they want."
The point is that what these people BELIEVE--is not allowed to be questioned! Why? Because it's correct? In NLP, we describe popular beliefs as "Global Beliefs." (Everybody knows THAT...). But, unfortunately, there is no such thing as "everyone."
Let's analyze the word "everyone." First, beware of modern dictionaries as they can throw you for a loop--and that's intentional.
Thus we employ etymonline.com, studying Etymology, the "facts of the origin and development of a word."
Every = "each, considered indefinitely as a unitary part of an aggregate."
One = "a single unit of the object focused upon."
In NLP, if you can't place it upon a wheelbarrow (even a gigantic one), it's not something you have; it's something you DO. "Everyone" is just a vague term. A label. "Each unit as part of an aggregate" implies "all." All what specifically? Every cockroach on the planet? All the humans on Earth or just in your town? Ask the Matrix Simulacra hypnotized person to be specific (they don't know how--thanks to our "Educational System").
In NLP, we ask key types of questions that virtually nobody uses in "real life" because that would start breaking into their Matrix-Simulacra prison. Example: "How do you know?" Notice that's not "Why?" Beginning a question with "why" provides the hypnotized with an avenue to their beliefs. Thus, they will REPEAT what they have heard instead of opening their mind to LEARN.
But "How do you know" requires they actually describe (should be in detail) how they developed that belief. (The hypnotized call their beliefs FACTS). Incidentally, the purpose of these NLP questions is to discover the legitimate beliefs that could be "factual" vs. those that are not.
Unsuitable responses to "How do you know" are: I read it somewhere; a well-known public figure said so; that's what I heard; it's on the Internet; it's in the News. Consider this NLP questioning technique as if you were in a court of law where you have to PROVE your claims. I would have said "Science," but unfortunately, that realm has become polluted with paid-for "studies" (stories) that if you investigate them thoroughly, you find smoke and mirrors as to the claims.
Tony Robbins' book, Awaken the Giant Within, said, "...THINKING itself is nothing but the process of asking and answering QUESTIONS." He also said, "...Evaluations are nothing but questions."
Per Oxford Dictionary:
QUESTION: A doubt about the truth or validity of something; the raising of a doubt about or objection to something.
Thus, it begs us to question: Are YOU "thinking" when you REFUSE to question? Are people "thinking" when they are not ALLOWED to question?
Moving onto the actual MATRIX - SIMULACRA, let's get into BELIEF SYSTEMS (NLP):
"In NLP, a belief is a series of decisions that eventually add up to making a strong assumption, commonly known as a belief. Serious generalizations we make about the world and our opinions about it. They form the rules about what we think we can and cannot do..."
Here is what others have said about beliefs in NLP:
Joseph O’Connor and John Seymour: “The generalizations we make about ourselves, others and the world and our operating principles in it. Beliefs act as self-fulfilling prophecies that influence all our behaviors.”
Richard Bandler and John Grinder: “Behavior is organized around beliefs. As long as you can fit behavior into someone’s belief system, you can get him to do anything or stop him from doing anything. A belief tends to be much more universal and categorical than an understanding. When you already have a belief, there’s no room for a new one unless you weaken the old belief first.”
Tony Robbins: “We usually think of belief in terms of creeds or doctrines, and that’s what many beliefs are. But in the most basic sense, a belief is any guiding principle, dictum, faith, or passion that can provide meaning and direction in life. Beliefs are the prearranged, organized filter to our perceptions of the world. Beliefs are the compass and maps that guide us toward our goals and give us the surety to know we’ll get there. Even at the level of physiology, beliefs (congruent internal representations) control reality. Belief is nothing but a state, an internal representation that governs behavior. Beliefs are preformed, programmed approaches to perception that filter our communication to ourselves in a consistent manner. Most people treat a belief as if it’s a thing when really all it is a feeling of certainty about something.”
Connirae Andreas: “Our limiting beliefs are found embedded within our Intended Outcomes.”
Robert Dilts: “Beliefs are not necessarily based upon a logical framework of ideas. They are, instead, notoriously unresponsive to logic. They are not intended to coincide with reality. Since you don’t really know what is real, you have to form a belief-a matter of faith.”
Everybody has beliefs. Question: Where DID your beliefs come from, and how did you form them? (Note Robert Dilts just above):
How Beliefs are formed:
1 - through personal physical experience (You performed X while on location Y at time Z either by yourself or with another)
2 - as the result of repetitive advertising (propaganda--see: TV, Mains Stream Media aka MSM, Hollywood Fiction)
3 - as the result of rational, logical deductive reasoning (Sherlock Holmes old-school level of investigation)
4 - as the result of others repeating "what happened" (people you know personally, know of, are famous, represent an "authority figure."
Myself, my beliefs suffered a massive overhaul and upgrade during my NLP training in 1991. Besides learning the above, I was guided by NLP expertise to investigate where my beliefs came from and in what CONTEXT they were legitimate.
As in fiction, the legal system, and performing an authentic scientific study, CONTEXT matters:
Per the Oxford Dictionary:
CONTEXT: The circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.
Imagine dissecting and analyzing everything you believed to be real utilizing NLP question techniques in regards to context. Yes, after I picked my brain up from the floor and dusted it off, I performed a severe examination at what I thought--believed--to be "real." At that moment, I decided that ALL my beliefs were "temporary guideposts" on the road that was my life path. Period. No exceptions. This made me VERY open-minded.
I also came to understand--realize that "proof" had several layers to it and connected to beliefs. Example: "There is a Japan." That's a global belief that most will call a "fact." Actually, that's inaccurate. Notice I didn't say "wrong." Context matters. There is a "Japan" in the context of world maps utilized by organizations that fly and navigate vehicles. It's on "the map," but the map does not equal the land! That's an entirely different context and one that requires physical experience (being in Japan).
The point here is that most beliefs don't take context into account. One could say, "What's the harm?" Look around. Australia and New Zealand are under siege, and its people don't want it overall. That "siege" is based upon a whopper of a "belief" whose context isn't allowed to be questioned. (Remember that Tony Robbins essentially said to think is to QUESTION (see above). If those countries people aren't allowed to question, are they thinking? Clearly NOT.)
Back to Japan. I've never been there. I've never flown over it. I've met people who have. There are maps, pictures, food...allegedly from Japan. Notice I said "allegedly."
Per Black's Law Dictionary:
ALLEGE: The assertion, declaration, or statement of a party to an action, made in a pleading, setting out what he expects to prove.
Yes, that's how SPECIFIC I am regarding language, especially regarding any claim ("fact") said by anyone, printed by anyone, etc. If I can't personally confirm it, then I have to either deny it or take a "leap of faith." My leap of faith is relatively rational as if Sherlock Holmes made that leap. Otherwise, I call bullshit. Today's New Normal is a whopper of a tail of bullshit, and that's coming from an NLP Belief System savvy Sherlock Holmes meets Captain Jack Sparrow.
Back to discussing Belief Systems: These two men were the founders of NLP, Richard Bandler, and John Grinder. Regarding Beliefs: “Behavior is organized around beliefs. As long as you can fit behavior into someone’s belief system, you can get him to do anything or stop him from doing anything. A belief tends to be much more universal and categorical than an understanding. When you already have a belief, there’s no room for a new one unless you weaken the old belief first.”
Let's look at that closely. BEHAVIOR. NLP is a model of how language PROGRAMS the mind. Where does that mind reside? In a human. If you program a computer, it will DO something even if that means staying idle. NLP is to PROGRAM humans. It's used by the top Think Tanks and the top .01% of humans. Ironically 99% of humans want nothing to do with how their mind works, forget programmed. That's a CLUE, incidentally.
Bandler and Grinder state, "As long as you can fit behavior into someone’s belief system, you can get him to do anything, or stop him from doing anything." How? By the repeated use of language and symbols (pictures). How? By having MSMedia persistently REPEAT a "story" to condition the mind, "THIS is important, new, and YOU must ACT (in the way we instruct you)." The reason is irrelevant but part of the story. Analyze late 2019 to the present day for a consistent story-narrative and observe the NEW behavior with humans across the world (masks, police arrests, mob-crowd rule, the legal system no longer functional, massive "shortages" with all sorts of supplies, food, etc.).
Then observe-read about the OTHER behavior that is censored...massive increase in drug addictions, alcohol abuse, spousal abuse, families torn apart by division, bankruptcy, small businesses can't hire people because unemployment pays more. And we haven't even gotten into the alleged "solution" to the "story" that was sold to everybody to make all these changes in BEHAVIOR (end goal).
Again it's worth noting per Bandler and Grinder: "As long as you can fit behavior into someone’s belief system, you can get him to do anything, or stop him from doing anything." That's ANYTHING.
Let's look at what Robert Dilts said: “Beliefs are not necessarily based upon a logical framework of ideas. They are, instead, notoriously unresponsive to logic. They are not intended to coincide with reality. Since you don’t really know what is real, you have to form a belief-a matter of faith.”
FAITH. YOU are being asked to "have faith" that the "New Normal Narratives-Stories" are FACT. You are requested, no REQUIRED to BELIEVE--OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED!
Where have we heard THAT one before? Hmm, it's almost like a subconscious play: "Have Faith and Believe (trust) us that what we WANT YOU TO DO--is for YOUR SAFETY." (Meanwhile, zillion-dollar profits are being made worldwide via the central bank's printing press. It's like the Sopranos took over the world).
If you are not curious to explore your own beliefs about where they came from, are they legit, and if your views are being used to control you...if you're not interested enough to EXPLORE...then you're under what they call in NLP, "TRANCE." Trance is the GOAL of NLP used by others to make others do what they would not normally do if provided with the complete picture details of the deal.
Either your belief system rules YOU...or you use it as a guide and can OPEN your mind to look beyond the STORY you're presented. Either you're in charge of yourself, and your mind--or someone else IS.
AND...How does one UNPLUG from the MATRIX - SIMULACRA (prison)?
Answer: You QUESTION "it" (your beliefs, a story, anything).
Remember the Key Maker in the Matrix movie? Questions = Keys. How you question matters!
Tony Robbins' "Awaken the Giant Within" says, "...the difference between people is the difference in the questions they ask consistently... it's not only the questions you ask, but the questions you FAIL to ask, that shape your destiny."
Excellent point; what do you FAIL to ask?
NLP Questions:
How do you know ___________?
What has to happen in order for ____________ to be true, false?
Who benefits from __________ happening or not?
What are the presumptions not being stated in this story?
What is being slid into the narrative so as to make us accept it without question and how?
When has this happened before, and what did that look like?
What kind of money is involved with this operation?
What conflicts of interest are involved with the people in this operation?
What is the past history of the people involved with this operation?
What other organizations have these people been involved with?
What is the symbolism, colors that are used to promote this operation?
What are you assuming will or won't happen that will benefit or harm you if you join this operation (treat it like an investment, like a business deal)?
What testimonials have been stated about the people involved with this operation, and are they favorable or not to trust this operation?
What has changed in Nature, the laws of physics, that makes the background story (reason) for this operation valid?
Are you allowed to question this operation, its story, background, and the players? If not, what happens if you do? Why not?
Who else is pushing this operation (do you have a clue on the resources and project management to produce a worldwide operation and the years of planning that lead up to it? In other words, can a "surprise THING" magically appear, and this worldwide operation is READY TO GO with "solutions" having been already manufactured YEARS before? How about PATENTS being created for the "solutions" IN ADVANCE?
Here's some extra information:
In a court of law, they use dictionaries. Black's Law Dictionary is one of the legal dictionaries. A dictionary is to keep the discussion or questioning (thinking, evaluating) "on the rails." The Legal system requires EVIDENCE. This means that your responses must provide evidence. If it's an opinion, then it's what a "rational and sensible" person would conclude.
Per Oxford Dictionary:
RATIONAL: Based on or in accordance with reason or logic.
REASON: A cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.
LOGIC: Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity; a particular system or codification of the principles of proof and inference (‘Aristotelian logic’); The systematic use of symbolic and mathematical techniques to determine the forms of a valid deductive argument.
DEDUCE: Arrive at (a fact or a conclusion) by reasoning; draw as a logical conclusion.
AUTHENTICATE: Prove or show (something) to be accurate, genuine, or valid.
PROVE: Demonstrate the truth or existence of (something) by evidence or argument.
Per THELAW.COM LAW DICTIONARY & BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 2ND ED.:
EVIDENCE: The proof which may be admitted that is both (i) relevant to the case in determining whether or not something is more or less true, and (ii) is reliable, that it can be authenticated
RELEVANCY: As a quality of evidence, “relevancy” means applicability to the issue joined. Relevancy is that which conduces to the proof of a pertinent hypothesis, a pertinent hypothesis being one which, if sustained, would logically influence the issue.
Either you're in charge of yourself, and your mind--or someone else IS.
If you like my thoughts, please check out my novel, Descendants of Atlantis on Amazon. It's jam-packed with more!
Comments